Back
to Book Reviews
Back to Cercles
|
Journals
Kurt Cobain
London: Viking/Penguin, 2002.
£20.00, 280 pages, ISBN 0-670-91370-7.
Claude Chastagner
Université de Montpellier III
Many trees have been wasted on account of bored and boring people who still like
to waste space with Nirvana dreck. (246)
I wonder if it was not unreasonable to entrust me with the review
of late Kurt Cobain's private notebooks. Almost three hundred
pages worth of doodles, amateurish
comic strips, drafts of letters, personal thoughts, lists of favorites songs
or bands, lyrics, and video concepts taken from the twenty or so remaining
notebooks out of the dozens Kurt Cobain wrote in his lifetime.
Unreasonable because I never
was a fan of Cobain's band, Nirvana. I want to be clear on this: that I never
was a fan does not mean I do not like Nirvana's music or cannot assess the
scope of the band. I am not convinced personal tastes should
play any role in reviewing
artworks or books, but if they do, I can certify that the unstable, limping
energy of Nirvana, America's most celebrated rock band of the
1990s, and the rawness
they displayed even in their most intimate and subtle songs (the live acoustic
album Unplugged is an excellent testimony to this) has had a profound
effect on me, as well as on millions of other listeners. Rarely had a fusion
of "punk energy with hard-rock riffs, all within a pop sensibility," (156)
a mixture soon to be dubbed "grunge", found such a powerful, uncompromising
expression.
But who but a fan could find any interest in what we are given to read? The
publisher has opted for a facsimile edition, the most interesting pages of
the remaining
notebooks having been digitally photographed, metal spirals included, and
given to us in the hand of Cobain himself. Only three pages of notes have
been added
at the end to give a few explanations, as well as the transcriptions of some
passages whose writing might have been difficult to decipher. Although almost
no dates are given, we can guess that the excerpts are in chronological order,
covering the period from the years prior to the first recordings (the late
1980s) till the days just before Cobain's suicide (1994). I shall not dwell
on the polemics
that has already surrounded this publication, regarding the moral right actress/band
leader Courtney Love, his widow, had to exhume these notebooks from the safe
they were locked in, nor on the financial deals behind their release. However,
I would like to concentrate on a few issues specific to the book itself.
In the first place, the publisher has decided on a luxury hardback edition,
in
a large,
almost A4 format, on thick, creamy paper, sold for a hefty £20,00. Is
this really the best way to make Cobain's private world accessible to the largest
number of followers? Is this really in keeping with the anti-materialistic,
anti-capitalistic
stance adopted by Cobain and his fellow band members? Is this really appropriate
to the purposely sloppy manner Cobain wrote in his notebooks?
Admittedly, we do learn a few things about Kurt Cobain, we are allowed some
interesting insights on his personality, his commitment to music, his poetical
leanings,
his political radicalism. Cobain has a touching, somewhat naïve schoolboy
dedication to drawing lists of his favorite British or American punk bands (Sonic
Youth, the Stooges, the Pixies, the Sex Pistols, the Melvins, the Vaselines,
etc.) which does not exclude a taste for early Beatles tracks or blues music.
One is struck by the consistency of his preferences throughout the years. It
may not be that influences are the best way to understand an artist's creation
but they help make out Cobain's background. One can also catch a glimpse of early
drafts of famous songs' lyrics ("Floyd the Barber", "Hairspray
Queen", "Mexican Seafood", "Lithium", "In Bloom", "Smells
Like Teen Spirit", "On a Plain"...) and observe their subsequent
evolution, though these versions differ marginally from the ones we know. More
interesting, though rather predictable, is Cobain's unabated rage at the music
business and specifically at the rock press. One is also given numerous frank
accounts of the unknown and extremely painful stomach illness that affected Cobain
and according to him, partly justified his drug consumption and his anorexic
looks, and might even be a possible cause for his suicide. Interestingly, one
of the most frequent derogatory terms used by Cobain to describe either capitalist
entrepreneurs or music business executives is "gluttony," a biblical
sin that acquires a new significance if linked to Cobain's impossibility to
ingest any food for days on.
A rather unexpected turn of Cobain's character is revealed by the numerous
drafts of letters he wrote to friends. One would have expected a more lackadaisical
approach to letter writing from a punk musician, and these drafts are a sobering
reminder of how easily appearances can alter our judgment. It is with a similar
care and dedication that Cobain would redraw on his notebook the various
road
signs he had to learn to pass his driving license, or would sketch out marketing
strategies, video scripts, promotional T-shirts' designs or the plans of
a new guitar bearing his name. If a graphologist might be delighted at the
prospect
of being given three hundred pages of Cobain's unedited handwriting, we can
merely notice how often Cobain crosses out words, alters sentences, often
awkwardly,
or adds adjectives until he has reached a successful turn of phrase. Not
quite the nihilistic, careless personality the media had portrayed. Similarly
surprising
is the kindness and consideration he displays when breaking Nirvana's first
drummer the news that the band has decided to fire him (15-17).
But the crudity of the notebook format does not allow for subtlety and much
of what Cobain has written betrays the limitations he was himself very much
aware
of and does nothing but strengthen the popular clichés about rock 'n'
roll life. This is at least what can be surmised from the publisher's choices.
Take for instance the page reproduced opposite the title page, a significant
one if any. On it, one can find a list of figures (presumably weekly or monthly
expenses) matching various items: booze 30, records 50, food 20, ticket 100.
Even if the veracity of such a list cannot be questioned, it only serves to foster
the cliché of the rock musician's life revolving around music, drugs,
and alcohol. Similarly, none of Cobain's ideas, as he himself admits, strike
for their potency or originality, little if any of his poetry displays any vivid
imagery, real emotion or interesting language, even by Jim Morrison or Lou Reed
standards. His humor (yes) seldom raises above schoolboy level: "Nirvana,
3 time granny award winners, n° 1 on billbored top 100 for 36 consecutive
weaks in a row. 2 times on the cover of Bowling Stoned, hailed...by Thyme & Newsweak."(52)
Even his prose verges on the painfully conventional, such as in the never released
biography he wrote for his record company: "...exclaims guitarist Kurt Cobain,...adds
bass guitarist Chris Novoselic,...rebuffs drummer Dave Grohl..."(156) No
wonder Cobain wrote on the cover of one of his notebooks, presumably as a warning
to a girlfriend, "don't read my diary when I'm gone." (iv)
"Don't read my diary," wrote Cobain, before adding "OK, Im going
to work now, when you wake up this morning, please read my diary. Look through
my things, and figure me out." This may be the only significant passage
of the whole book, "Im going to work;" the only justification for sneaking
through Cobain's private life might be the intensity and scope of the work accomplished
by himself and his band. One would indeed love to try and figure out how such
levels of creativity were reached, and where they stem from. Unfortunately, the
journals are not going to help us. They reveal, says the book's flap, "an
artist who loved music, who knew the history of rock": what an astounding
discovery! But I am afraid the rest of the blurb is even less convincing: "Here
is a mesmerizing, incomparable portrait." They should try harder. I said
earlier that none but fans could find reasons to read such lame, predictable,
and emotionless private-turned-public excerpts. But even this restriction is
inappropriate. Fans are to be respected, honored, and protected. This book despises
them. "I hope it does not sell," says my girlfriend, a big Nirvana
fan. I believe the message is clear: maximum rip-off.
Cercles©2003
All rights are reserved and no reproduction from this site for whatever
purpose is permitted without the permission of the
copyright owner. Please contact us before using any
material on this website.
|
|